Showing posts with label TechMatters. Show all posts

Facebook Free Basics - Is that free Internet really?





Right across the busy junction on my regular commute to office, a big hoarding has come up in last few days. It is about Facebook's initiative - Free Basics. A huge media campaign is under way at the moment across all channels. It is supposedly a philanthropic effort to provide free internet to people who cannot afford it. Sounds like a great idea. However it has been surrounded with controversy and criticism since when it was launched. So what's the noise all about?
Here is a closer look.

What is Free Basics?

The erstwhile internet.org, now renamed to Free Basics, is Facebook and Reliance Communication's joint effort to provide free internet to everyone. An attempt to bring the entire country of a billion+ online. However the devil is in the details. There is a difference between Free Internet and Free Basics. It's not the entire internet that is free. Only a few "registered" services (aka websites) that are on-board are free. Facebook included. And of course provided those services are accessed through Reliance SIM Card.

It is interesting to see why Facebook and Reliance are so keen to push this through. After all, why would a company run a massive media campaign for a charity initiative? Well, the truth of the matter is, it is not really charity. Mark Zuckerberg wants Facebook in every hand so that his advertisement revenue increases. As regards Reliance, Facebook's own survey based on data from other countries says that once people start using the "limited" free internet, more than 50% upgrade to a paid service.

There doesn't seem to be anything wrong in this.

The issue is that of Net Neutrality.

Now what's Net Neutrality? 

Since the birth of the internet, the world has been working towards the principles of Net Neutrality. What this means is every content on the internet must be treated equally. Of course subject to age restrictions for certain sensitive content. The internet service itself must not provide preferential treatment to a sub-set of services available on the internet. The biggest exception to this of course is China and Middle East. However those parts of the world are known for restrictions, on every aspect of life - Internet included.

An open, free internet service is a must of fair competition and growth. A service like Free Basics is kind of biased towards certain set of services (web sites) which are on-board with it and hence carry tremendous advantage over those that aren't. Moreover, Facebook is a commercial organization. Activist doubt the real intent of Facebook behind the service.

Free Basics has been opposed by all activists and proponent of Net Neutrality. It is obviously strongly opposed by those services that are not being offered through Free Basics. Paytm founder famously compared Facebook's tactics with those of East India Company centuries ago. While that me a far stretched comparison, there is a merit in looking at it from Net Neutrality perspective.

In summary 

It is a service that has some great advantages which include internet access to people who cannot really afford it, although in a restrictive manner. Internet access to these hands can potentially open many more opportunities for them. The flip side is that it is strictly against the principles of Net Neutrality. It can potentially encourage monopoly.

TRAI right now seeking comments on Free Basics. The dead line has been extended until January 17, 2016. It is supposed to make its recommendation by end of Jan. It will be interesting to see the outcome, as it is likely to steer the evolution of the internet in India.


Steps to Hack Facebook Account and Way to Shield From the Same


How would you react if you knew your Facebook account was hacked? Worst, the hacker not only got into your account, but changed the login ID, reset all security, removed alternative emails and phone numbers and left you with absolutely no means to recover your access? Blame your not-so complex password? Not really. Its a flaw in Facebook's legacy security setting which one can exploit. You don't need to be a hacker to do it either. Read on for the step-by-step method to hack into a Facebook account and a way to shield from such an attack as well.
Facebook account of somebody close to me was hacked last early morning. What followed was a deep investigation to recover the account and to know what exactly happened. Thanks to Mr. Hacker, I now know the precise steps how this was done and figured out ways protect against such an attack. Here are the details.

The objective here is not to encourage such hacking, but to create awareness and help you secure your account from such an easy but brutal hack.

Part A: The Hack

Step 1: Log off from Facebook and go to https://www.facebook.com/recover/initiate
Step 2: Enter the user name/email ID/Name of the target account. Click Search

Step3: Facebook gives you the following options to recover the target account.
You will see the Profile pick of the target account on the right. It has been blurred here.
Step 4: Click on "No Longer have access to these?" link at the bottom left.
Step 5: Facebook gives you the option to enter a new email ID to be linked to the target account. Provide your own email ID. Make sure it is not linked to any existing Facebook account. Click continue.
Step 6: Unless you have set in the right security settings, Facebook throws a security question that you would have chosen right at the time of creating the Facebook account. In most of the cases, the answer to this question is anybody's guess. See example below.
Step 7: Assuming you entered the answer correctly, you will be presented with an option to set the new password.
 Step 8: Facebook will now send a link to your email ID (the one you provided in step 5) to link the email ID to the target account. Click on that link.
Step 9: Once you activate the link that you received in your email, Facebook attaches the new email ID and  the password to the account. You still need to wait for 24 Hrs.
Step 10: Wait for 24 hrs. Bingo. You have got access to the account with the new email ID and password that you specified.

Some major concerns in this implementation. I hope Facebook fixes this sometime.

  • There is no way to change the security question or the answer to it. If you made a mistake in selecting a very simple question and obvious answer while registering... too bad.
  • There are no notifications to the original email ID when somebody tries to add a new email ID, at least during that 24 Hr window.
  • It basically assumes everyone in the world is very honest :-)

Part B: Shielding your account from this hack

If the hack is easy, the shield from it is even easier. Follow the following steps.
Step 1: Login to Facebook and go to "Account Settings". Select "Security" tab from the left side menu.
Step 2: Click on Trusted Contacts. The below screen opens
If there are no trusted contacts specified, it means your account is vulnerable to the above hack.
Step 3: Click on Choose Trusted Contacts. Facebook will popup a screen to describe what Trusted Contacts are. Click on "Choose Trusted Contacts" on the pop-up
Specify at least 3, maximum 5 friends from your list whom you can trust. Below is the recommendation in selecting Trusted Contacts
  1. Somebody who is close to you and whom you can fairly trust
  2. Somebody who will be accessible outside of Facebook. Through Phone or personal meet
  3. Someone who will have access to their Facebook account when you are need
  4. Typically your immediate family, close friends, colleagues will do. 
Note that Trusted Accounts will only help you recover your account in a safe manner. They will "NOT" get access to your account.
Step 4: Done.

Part C:  How does this safeguard from the hack?

Assuming a hacker tries to apply the above algorithm, he/she will get stuck at step 6. In stead of asking the vulnerable Security question, Facebook will through the following screen.
This account recovery process requires you to get in touch with the three (or five) trusted accounts that you added earlier offline (phone/personal meet). They will need to go to the URL  https://www.facebook.com/recover where Facebook will ask them to confirm if "you" had contacted them and whether you were really wanting to recover the account. If they confirm, they will be presented with a numeric code that they will need to tell you and you will need to enter the same in the above screen. This needs to be done with all the trusted contacts.

Given the importance of Social media in our day-to-day lives, it is critical to safeguard your Facebook account if you have one. Remember that even if you are not so active on Facebook, if your account gets into wrong hands, those hands can make it active... possibly in the wrong way. 

Hope this helps. I hope you secure account by setting trusted contacts setting. I will be happy to be one of those for you :-)

Top 5 Things That Make Your Smart Phone Dumb


In my earlier blog I wrote about the recent hot trends that make a smart phone even smarter. There are enough things out there that still make your smartest phone a dumbo. Here is my take on things that still need major attention from the Apples and Samsungs of the world. Hope somebody is listening.

1. Battery Life

If there is one thing that anybody who has ever used a smart phone would want to improve in a smart phone is its battery life. There are hardly any smart phones that can last more than a fair usage of a business day. Add wifi or 3G/4G, GPS, Bluetooth, multimedia and a fully charged phone can dry up within hrs. It isn’t that the muscle power in the battery has not improved. The mAh specification of the battery (an indication of how much fuel a Li-ion battery carries) has steadily increased over a period of time. Take Samsung’s flagship Galaxy S series for example. The mAh rating has increased from 1650 for S2, to 2100 for S3 and finally 2600 mAh for S4. Ideally S4 should long 1.6 times long. However, the phones themselves have become mightier and so has their consumption. The quad-core or even eight core processors, Large HD displays and all those frills like NFC come at a cost of battery life. Every now and then I do experience the frustration of my cell phone breathing its last right in the mid of an important phone call. That’s when I miss my good old Nokia brick so much.

2. Interoperability

I wish there was more standardization. I wish there was more inter-operability. I wish all accessories of one phone would work with others. I wish the Bose Docking station for the iPhone would work with the Android Phone. I wish there was just one universal charger pin for all cell phones. Unfortunately that’s not really the case. Off course there are business reasons the manufacturers for doing so. Accessories is a big revenue stream. A more proprietary accessory is likely to lock down customers. All those Docking Stations, Chargers, car accessories made for iPhone are a major exit barrier for anybody who has invested in those accessories and looking to buy an Android phone. Apple is known for its “Closed Ecosystem”. It goes beyond chargers, docking stations and accessories. Need to print from your phone? Make sure the Printer is AirPrint compatible. Want to stream music? Get an AirPlay compatible player (aka Apple TV). Things work beautifully so long as all your devices are from the Apple eco system. “Land and Expand” strategy at its best. Android is relatively better when it comes to openness. It supports open standards like DLNA, UPnP for Media Streaming, NFC for device-to-device communication, Qi for wireless charging and so on. Apple leaves far more things to be desired when it comes to interoperability. And you know what? It’s by choice.

3. Call Quality

It has been a major debate whether a smart phone has any role to play with the call quality. The manufacturers usually blame it on the service providers for the poor call quality. While in most of the cases it might be true, the reality is that the phone itself has a lot to influence call quality. J D Power published a study a while back to measure the Cellular Call Quality measured as Problems Per 100 (PP100) calls. The study discovered that the call quality has declined over last one decade and also that the PP100 score was higher for Smart Phones than for the normal phones. A very simple and logical reason for this difference in performance is that Smart Phones pack just so much into a little slim and sleek device that there is no room to “optimize” the phone for better call quality. I can’t agree more.

4. Fragility

Remember the first Nokia Ad - “Made for India”?


The Ad beautifully emphasized the ruggedness of the Nokia phones. I don’t intend to hang the phone outside the truck. But I do want the phone to survive occasional drops, occasional exposure to water, scratches and a bit rough use. My phone already has a cracked back cover. It looks so ugly. Smart phones are known for their fragility. They cant beat those old Nokia phones for sure. However, this is an area where a lot of improvement is expected to happen. Sony already claims its Xperia Z is water proof. The screens made out of Sapphire were demoed in Consumer Electronics Show this yr. The material is expected to make the mobile screens Concrete proof. See for yourself


5. Far Away from True Office Productivity

No matter how smart the phones become, they are still far away from replacing your bulky old school laptop. You may buy highly rated, fancy Office Apps from app stores. But nothing can replace the Office Suite on a laptop. Its not only about Word, Excel and Powerpoint. Even writing an important longish email is bit cumbersome on a phone. I still prefer a laptop for such a use case.  But I would love to use just one device that does it all. I am not sure if it is even possible ever. May be I am asking too much.

I can live without the last one. But the phones of the future better address these fundamental rights of a cell phone users. NFCs, Wire Less Chargins and Finger Hovers can wait.

Posted by Amol Mategaonkar
22nd April 2013
Originally Posted at http://digitalden.tumblr.com/

Hot new features that make your Smart Phone even Smarter

The completion for the Numero Uno slot in Smart Phones has ner been so hot. Cutting edge technology backed by engineering muscles of the giants is ensuring that your smart phone gets even more smarter. Here is the top-10 list of new trends and features that we have seen in new smart phones


1. Killer Cameras

Just when we thought Camera in a cellphone was more of a commodity, the Samsungs, Nokia and Apples of the world bumped it up with killer specs – hardware as well as software. Samsung’s latest kid on the block – Galaxy S4 – boasts of a giant 13 Megapixel camera. Nokia went further with its PureView technology and introduced Nokia PureView 808 that has a 41 Mega Pixel Sensor.
The war of cameras goes beyond Megapixels. Check out LG Optimus 3D with abilities to shoot and play 3D photos and videos. See here. And yes, did I tell you that you don’t need those annoying 3D glasses for watching 3D content. Super cool.
Then there are all these frills around cool features like video shooting with both cameras at the same time in S4, Sweep Panorama, Low Light Shooting Sensors of Sony’s Experia Z, Filters, Face Detection. This list can go on.

2.    Stunning Displays

iPhone 4 revolutionized the display of Cell Phones with its “Retina Display Technology” in 2010 with 330 ppi (Pixel Per Inch) density. Steve Jobs claimed that it is beyond the abilities of a human eye to recognize the difference beyond this resolution of 330 ppi. While Apple is till sticking with a ppi around the same number, the completion has moved on with 400+ppi territory. S4 has 441 ppi. With 1080P full HD support, the displays of today’s smart phones is stunning with clear and crisp texts and sharp images. Wonder what effect has on battery consumption though.

3. Wireless Charging

The new Wireless Charging Technology found in Nokia Lumia phones allows for charging your cellphone without wires. You still need to “put” the phone on a compatible Wireless Charging device, typically a Charging Pad. Imagine just dumping your phone on a Charging Pad while you are driving a car or when you sleep at night and the phone gets charged. The new Qi wireless standard is being adopted by the industry with lead from Nokia. Check out Nokia Lumia 920.This means that a Nokia Wireless charger can potentially charge compatible Samsung Galaxy phone.

4. NFC (Near Field Communication)

Near Field Communication is the latest buzz in phone-to-phone and phone-to-accessories communication. Bring two NFC Compliant devices next to each other and share the content seamlessly. Simply touch your Nokia Lumia 920 with the compliant Headset accessory and bingo! Bluetooth is such a passé.

5. Processing Prowess

The CPUs of smart phones have become increasingly powerful. Galaxy S4 has an Eight Core processors with 2 GB RAM.  These Specs beat the laptop that I had few years back hands down. The rich graphics, heavy games and ever increasing need for a snappy and fluid touch screen demands heavy muscles bundled in a thin package of a smart phone.

6.    Smart Touch or Not

All smart phones have Capacitive Touch Screens these days. However, the capacitive touch requires you to touch the screen with your fingers. Try using it while walking in a chilly and windy weather of Chicago and I bet you will wish you had that old school phone with buttons. Capacitive Touch does not work with gloves on. Not anymore though. Nokia Lumia 920 allows you to operate your phone with gloves on.
Galaxy S4 goes further. It has this cool feature of “Finger Hover”.  Want to peek into the email before you open it? Just hover your finger over the email (without actually touching it) and the Email App shows you two line summary of the email. There are many other Apps that support the “Finger Hover”. This is similar to a “Mouse Hover” in the good old PCs.

7. Eye to Eye

The front cameras of the phones are no longer only for Video Chats etc. Check out Galaxy S4s cool new features. The Front Camera of Samsung has the ability to watch your eye movements and make the phone behave accordingly. For example, the phone switches off the display if it senses no one is looking at it, saving some battery. It can also stop and start videos depending on whether someone is looking at the screen. The video will automatically pause if you glance away from screen and it will restart when the eyes refocus on the screen. Pretty cool.

8. Size Matters

The size of the smart phones is trending to increase. It all started with 3.5inch Apple iPhone. Samsung raised the bar with 4.3 Inch S2. S3 was bigger 4.8 inch. S4 is even bigger – 5 inch. The Note II is even bigger with 5.5 inch screen. LG, HTC, Sony have similar size phones. And that seems to be the trend. Apple is falling in line, slowly.

9. Water Resistance

I wish we had this few years back. I would have saved one phone at least. Sony’s Xperia Z boasts off to be water resistant. Pour water on it. Dip it completely into water. The company guarantees your machine will be safe. Wow ! Great boon during the Mumbai rains.

10. And all those Frills

a. Virtual Personal Assistant – Hello Siri.
The voice assisted virtual assistant on your phone is new frill, lead by Appl’s Siri. I have doubts how useful it is though. Samsung has SVoice
b. Infrared Booster – Double up as TV Remote
This may be quite useful. Double up your Phone as a Universal Remote with its Infrared capabilities. Check out Galaxy S4 and HTC OneX
c. Tilt to Scroll
No need to touch. Tilt the phone up and down to scroll.
d. Fitness Tracker
More of an app. But quite useful. Galaxy S4

Still to Come

Then there is buzz around what’s in Store.

  • Unbreakable Glass
  • Flexible Phones – Prototype has been on display during last CES Event in the US
  • Good Battery Life. This is my fantasy though. Its not going to be a reality soon
Posted by Amol Mategaonkar
5th April 2013
Originally posted at http://digitalden.tumblr.com/

Google Nexus 7 Tablet Arrives in India


Few months after its roller coaster ride in the US and other parts of the world, Google's Tablet poster boy - Nexus 7 - arrives in India. The starting price of Rs. 15,999 is a killer deal.Give this guy a serious look if you are planning to buy a 7" tablet.Google Nexus 7 has some serious specs and design elements.
  • Quad Core Processor
  • 1280 x 800 HD Resolution. This is awesome for 7" size
  • Android Jelly Bean
  • Thin and light - 344 gms and 0.4 inches
  • Although it can't beat the form factor of iPad mini, it is still very convenient to hold and carry around
It has some limitations though
  • No expandable memory
  • No front camera

This is a Google branded Android tablet. This does not mean it is manufactured by Google. It is in fact manufactured by Asus. The Google Nexus branding implies that Google played an active role in its design and is expected to have perfected it.
The Nexus 7 is now available on Google Play market for Rs. 15,999. I think its a great value proposition for a table with these specs, given that other 7" tabs like Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 sell at around Rs. 19,000. You can order the Nexus 7 on Google Play store here.Posted By: Amol Mategaonkar29th March 2013Originally posted at http://digitalden.tumblr.com/

Privacy amidst Pirates of the Internet Sea


“There will come a time when it isn’t ‘They’re spying on me through my phone’ anymore. Eventually, it will be ‘My phone is spying on me.”
Philip K. Dick
Phillip Dick was so right when he said these words.

Recently I read a story about a man named Matt in the East Coast of United States who claimed that Facebook somehow figured out his very deep personal secrets even before he shared those with anybody else including his family.  Read the story here. Tracking your personal data and popping up related ads is nothing new. The little cookies left on your computer by websites were used for this purpose. However, what scares me is that this has gone to a completely new level now. It’s no more as simple as deleting the cookies and getting rid of the hack.

What is backing this silent upsurge hunger towards your personal attributes and behavior is a massive technology referred to as “Big Data”. Large corporations with heavy computing muscles - Facebook, Google, Amazon and numerous other faceless ones as well - have built the capabilities of tracking every little aspect of what you do – not only in the virtual world, but also in physical world – and then run complex intelligent algorithms to figure out your deep rooted secrets.

In Matt’s example, he commented twice on an article regarding “Equality in Marriage” on a website that was powered by Facebook Open Graph APIs. The website provided the facility to comment on its articles using Facebook’s infrastructure. As a result Facebook algorithms picked up those comments and presented Matt with those recommendations concluding that Matt was a gay. There are examples where the large retail stores in the US – like Target, Wal-Mart, etc – track your “check outs” and derive a pattern about your preferences, likings and developments in personal life.

There are three very important observations that are very relevant from this example
  • Matt’s behaviour was tracked from a normal website and not directly from Facebook. The website used Facebook APIs and that’s how the comments reached Mr. Zuckerberg
  • The algorithms are now so sophisticated that they can identify very indirect relationships between two not so related things – something a human bran may also miss
  • The data and its analysis is out there with the big giants. Its no more on your own computer like the good old cookies which you could clean up and get rid of them. Matt will never ever be able to erase the impression Facebook has made about him.
Scary? Yeap.

Big Data is here to stay. Pirates of the Internet Sea are equipped with huge engineering muscles. Whether you like it or not, they know enough about you. Is there a way to hide? Well, the only option is to exercise little caution while in the virtual world. Think twice before liking a page, putting a comment and clicking on “plus 1”. Ask yourself whether it is really required? Are you ok if this is made available to everyone in the world? Most importantly to the most genius algorithm written by the best minds in the technology world?  If the answer is “Yes”, you are safe.

Posted by Amol Mategaonkar
Mumbai
23rd March 2013
Originally posted on http://digitalden.tumblr.com

The Big Change at Google & the Microsoft Analogy

Yesterday Google announced that the current CEO, Eric Schmidt, who ran the company for more than 10 years will step down. The co-founder of Google, Larry Page will take over from him. It is interesting to see a giant like Google shaking it’s leadership even after consistent stellar performance on the balance sheet. At the face of it, it might look as if all this was uncalled for, especially when the company is doing so well on the stock market, on its revenues as well as net profits.
That’s where new age technology companies like Google differ. Balance sheets are the last thing to worry for them.
Google is at a stage where Microsoft was at one point in time. It had demonstrated phenomenal growth and leadership in technology innovation and a mass reach that seemed to be unparalleled in the history of computing. The king of Desktop software (Windows and Office) was on a dream run for almost decade with more than 90% share of whatever market it entered. However, things changed with the fast changing winds of early 2000s and it could not keep pace with the rapid innovation driven by the internet. In spite of an early advantage that it had with the acquisition of Hotmail, Microsoft has been by and large a laggard in bringing in internet based innovations. A small start-up from California like Google went on to become giant and has already started challenging Microsoft on its own turf of Operating Systems and Office Applications. While MS still continues to enjoy market leadership position in Desktop software, it is no more perceived as a Technology Innovation Leader.
Google has potentially similar problem in-front of it.
The way MS missed the internet innovation bus, Google is threatened by the Social Media trend. While the Social Media has reached billions across the world, Google has been rather unsuccessful in creating a space for itself here. Orkut was once popular in India and Brazil, but failed to have a global reach. Buzz was a disaster. Google Wave started with much fan fare but had to be shut down within 18 months for very low adoption. On the other hand, the world saw the rise and rise of Twitter and Facebook. Facebook, with an estimated revenue of 1 Billion USD last year, already has a valuation of 50 Billion USD. With a user base of more than 500 million and growing, it is the most popular internet app in the world. Two months back the overall time spent on Facebook surpassed the total time spent on all Google properties put together. It has already become a household name, just like Google.
Google can not just sit and watch this happen.
With the size and complexity of its business, Google has somewhere hit the Big Company Syndrome, making it slow and less friendly to innovation. The change at the top, is precisely to address this problem. Under Page’s leadership, Google hopes to bring back the pace, speed and nimbleness of the young companies like Facebook while still being a large financial giant.
The Adult Supervision that Eric Schmidt brought to the then young and budding Google, seems to have become a bottleneck, just 10 yrs down the line. Google has been proactive to fix this. Unlike Microsoft.

Adam - A Desi iPad Killer ?

It has been quite some time that I wrote on this blog. However, I wanted to write about something that I am really excited about . Adam - soon to launch Tablet Computer from NotionInk. The innovative design of this Tablet has already created lot of excitement since when it was first shown in the Mobile World Congress 2010. What is more exciting about this is that it is completely Desi at heart. It's designed and built by an Indian company in Bangalore - NotionInk under the leadership of the young innovator - Roshan Shravan. http://www.notionink.in/ The super cool innovations in this product, coupled with a lucrative price makes it a potential iPad killer. Here is why.
Design
The Adam has loads of innovations built into the design of the Tablet itself. With the unique "Curve" design, 180 degree turning camera, multi-touch capacitive touch screen, Pixel Qi e-ink technology (will explain this below), innovative track pad navigation from the back side, NotionInk has dozens of patented elements into the new gadget.
User Experience
The User Interface of the Tablet is extremely fresh and young. Have a look at some of the screenshots here. The company promises completely new user experience on this gadget. The Adam is built using Google's Android Operating System, however completely customized for its use. As you might know, Android is fast becoming the Operating System of choice on the Smart Phones. However, looking at the size of the Tablet, which is quite larger compared to a smart phone, NotionInk has customized the OS to suite their needs and also made many innovations to enable far richer user experience. Going by the limited previews available for the product, they seem to have done pretty impressive job.
Performance
Adam boasts of an impressive nVidia Dual Core 1GHz processor, supposedly faster than the Apple A4 processor in iPad. This means much faster processing speeds and graphics responses. Roshan Shravan claims a battery life of 16 Hrs compared to 10 hrs of iPad.
Pixel Qi e-ink Display
The Adam has an optional Pixel Qi display. This means simply that you can clearly read the tablet even if you are standing in bright sun. This feature is currently found in eBook readers like Amazon Kindle. Even iPad does not have it so well. See the demo of this in the video.
Connectivity
Adam supports three USB ports and an HDMI output. This means that you can connect external devices like hard drives, mouse, keyboards to it at the same. Also, you can project the tablet on a High Definition TV using the HDMI port. Sorry. The iPad is nowhere closer Mr. Jobs. Apart from this, it also supports Wifi, 3G and GPRS. It also has GPS chip.
Price
The Adam is priced between $375 to $549 (depending upon connectivity and display options). Compare this with iPad that ranges between $499 to $799. Moreover, Adam will have a global price. This means that this will make it even more attractive price in Europe. India hasn't seen the formal launch of iPad yet. The max price of $549 of fully loaded Adam (Rs. 24,000) is extremely exciting compared to an iPad that is available for 38000 in the gray market. The price is cheaper than many smart phones like higher end Blackberry, Motorola Droid and iPhone.
See an interview of Shravan here



A few Questions though
All the above looks very lucrative and exciting. I do have these questions before I finally give out my verdict.
  • I understand that Adam has customized Android OS for its use. What does this mean for the millions of applications available out there on the Android market? Will those applications work on the Adam? If they don't, then Adam has a huge set back given that iPad has a killer app market and anything and everything you need is available there.
  • The looks of it are impressive - especially the User Interface. Will the experience itself be as impressive? I mean, will the response time of the touch screen be as lucid as an iPad?
  • Will it be available in India? :-) Steve Jobs was ok. But hope Mr. Shravan does not ignore his own motherland.
The Adam has started taking pre-orders since couple of days back. It is being manufactured in China and being shipped world-wide from there. If it stands up to the expectations and excitement it has created, it is definately an iPad killer and surely a reason enough for all of us to be proud of. Finally, are we up for a real global IT product Made (oops, designed) in India?

Google's Changing Personality

I am not sure if you have observed this, but recently Google added a small new feature to the legendary http://www.google.com/ page. The change might look very subtle, but it indicates a major shift from the very fundamental principle of UI Design that google is known for - minimalistic design. I have no clue why google has done this. Let me explain.
The Classical Way
Google is known for its simplicity in User Interface (UI) design. Its UIs are easy to use, intuitive and free of clutter. The best example of this is http://www.google.com/ The world's most visited website just had a google logo, a text box and two buttons - "Google Search" and "I am Feeling Lucky". Over a period of time Google added links to other google applications such as News, Image Search, YouTube, Orkut, Photos and so on in addition to some language options. It even added a feature last year where all these options and links are hidden by default and get enabled only when you move the mouse a little.

The story has it that when the google founders created google, they didn't know HTML coding and they created a very simple design which they could code. Over the period of time that became the signature design of google. Just a plain white background, google logo and a text box with two buttons. I loved it. Millions loved it the world over. However, Google just lost it... well almost.

The New Option
Recently google added a new link towards the left side bottom of google.com. It reads "Change Background Image". You need to sign-in with your google ID in order to use this feature. What this allows you to do is that you can either upload your own image or select from an existing set of publicly available images that you can set as background to your google.com home page. The image shows up in the background whenever you use google.com anywhere in the world.

Issues
The classical plain white simplistic design has been googl's signature. I am not sure about the motivation for this feature. Somehow I feel, this is a step away from its own legacy. There are some challenges with it as well. The user can really shoot herself in the feet. Try uploading an image that is too small or too big to fit your screen. It messes up the entire look. Second issue is with the logo. Since google can not predict the image color scheme, it has made the logo transparent white. This is again a big deviation from the signature multi-color design of google logo. Thirdly, if you upload a heavy image, it makes the loading of the page slow. Google is known for its speed. Its the most reliable and fast website in the world. A heavy background can make it slow.
Copy Cat???
Did google find motivation for this feature in Microsoft's bing? The way Plain background has been the signature design for Google, beautiful background images has been the key design principle of Microsoft's new search engine - http://www.bing.com/ I love that as well. It has a slightly different approach and does not have any of the issues relating to googl's approach that I mentioned above. Every day it has a new, rich quality background image, showing some famous place in the world. It also provides some useful info about it on mouse over. It does not allow user-uploaded images. The user can not shoot in her feet. When it was introduced last year, this looked new and fresh. Many who used it, loved it.. including me. However, was this the motivation for the new feature in google? I hope not.
I hope the biggest innovator on the Internet didn't have to copy it from Microsoft and had some other inspiration that I am not aware of.

You are being watched.... by Facebook

Facebook has been the punching bag of the security and privacy advocates for ever. No wonder the movie on facebook, "The Social Effect" has the tag line "When you make 500 million friends, you are bound to make enemies". The biggest criticism for facebook has been that it knows too much about us and there are concerns about security and privacy of this data. Usual response to this criticism is that this is social media and if you are so concerned about privacy, don't share it. I was convinced with this argument until recently when I figured out, there are things which you don't explicitly share, but eventually reach facebook. Here is an example where you need to be aware that facebook is watching you. Many, won't know. I didn't.

Background
Recently, facebook introduced Social Plugins. These are facebook components that any website in the world could embed in their own webpage to provide social networking features through facebook. Examples are - "share on facebook", "like" button, friend list, comments, etc. This requires that the visitor has logged-in to facebook, may be through another browser window or tab. If a website ebmbeds the facebook "like" button on its webpage, the visitors of the website will be able click on "like" button (very similar to you like videos, photos, status messages etc on facebook itslef). This will result into an update on your Wall that you liked that link. This is good. I have no problems with this.
I have a problem with what it does next. Read on.

The Use Case
Follow the steps below.
  1. Login to facebook.
  2. Go to any article on Times Of India. Say this one.
  3. Look at the bottom. You will see this facebook plugin - "Recommend".
  4. If you observe closely, it also tells you if any of your friends have recommended this. In my case it says "Be the first of your friends to recommend this."

What happens in the background?
If you imagine the logic of this, the code snippet from facebook that TOI would have embedded in this page would have sent this info to facebook that amol has visited so and so URL, and in-return asked if anybody from amol's friends recommended this URL? In my case facebook returned none.
The Issue
This is scary. I just happened to be logged in to facebook in some another browser window and without even checking with me, the plugin sent the info to facebook that I visited Times of India - this article. I hate this. I didn't choose to add/enable this plugin to TOI. It did not check with me and peacefully sent the info to facebook that I visited this page. If you don't observe carefully, you would not even see the facebook plugin amidst the clutter on the site. Thankfully facebook didn't put it on my wall , but mind well... it knows that you visited it.
I do share a lot of info on facebook.com through my wall.... my status, photos, videos, links, etc. However, there I do it conciously.... by choice. Here, I never chose to do it. I don'thave option to turn it off either. Forget it, I didn't even know it did all this.
Simple Advise
Log off from facebook after you are done. Don't keep yourself logged in through out the day. Be aware that you are being watched.

The Social Network Effect

Recently I was reading the book - "The Facebook Effect" by David Kirkpatrick. Its the amazing story of Facebook - the phenomenon that has caught up the entire world since last few years and its effect the world over. I believe, especially in the Indian context, the impact of facebooks and orkuts of the world can be much more significant... I worry... to the extent of being cultural.

About facebook
With 500 million active users and growing at an approx pace of 100 million per 150 days, it the third most populous country in the world, next to China and India, if it was a country. Founded by a (then) 19 yr old Mark Zuckerberg at Harward, it has taken over all of its contemporaries Myspace, Orkut and bunch of others. It is the second most visited website on the Internet, next to Google.com. Its the most talked about Internet company today, loved as well as hated at the same time. It has also inspired a Hollywood Movie, "The Social Network", scheduled to release in Sept 2010.

facebook in India
Facebook is the most popular social networking site in India. It has surpassed Orkut's over last one year. The growth has been phenomenal. One significant observation is that it has been able to reach out to all age groups. Social media (at least India) was always perceived to be for young generation or IT savvies. However, people of all ages, professions, even those who have just learnt to boot a computer, all of them are hoping on to facebook. While its a good sign of IT penetration to the Indian common man, there are some strange observations.
  • You can see colleagues sitting next to each other putting stuff on each others walls on facebook. What is so great about the wall that you can not directly talk ?
  • Son/Daughters putting comments on their parents wall and vice-versa. This is extreme.
  • I get friend requests from people whom I have never seen/met. What does that mean? I know nothing about them. The entire notion of "friend request" is at times misinterpreted.
  • There are people who spend 2-3 hrs on facebook every day.
  • People tend to use facebook as a medium of chatting.
These are indications of some fundamental changes the facebooks and Orkuts of the world are bringing to our society. They have given a fresh, new and lucrative channel of communication. As a result, instead of picking up the phone and talking to friends, we log on to facebook and write something on their wall. Instead of planning to meet a friend/relative on Sunday evening, people would spend time in reading useless comments others have put on their stuff and even contribute to it.
The Undesired Effect
This is an undesired side effect of the social media. Don't get me wrong. I am a heavy user of facebook. It is a very powerful tool to express yourself to your buddies, share your ideas, your thoughts, happenings in your life, your joys & sorrows. It is a great channel to find those old school friends you never met in last 20 yrs since you completed SSC. It has a potential to influence and move large groups towards a common goal. E.g. Facefook has helped large scale national movements like the one in Colombia a few yrs back. However, it can never substitute the charm and warmth of talking to your friend over a phone or more so, meeting them in person.
Especially in our society, which has traditionally given very high importance to family and social values, a facebook cannot replace the chaukats and nukkads of our bastees. If it does, its a major cultural shift.
So, go to the Profile info of your old friends in Facebook, pickup the contact number and give them a call. You will realize, it is much more satisfying than writing "wats up buddy?" on his/her wall.